arrive in the U.S. always the most innovative ideas. The latest concerns a law that women applying for abortion must first make room in the house, organize the room for the baby likely, and then give him even a name. This
found, beyond the originality of those cases in Italy, where the aborted fetus was even made the funeral with all the trappings of Catholic ritual and burial inevitable.
The idea is brilliant and the assumption that women are ignorant. Legislators have well thought out to provide them with the most information about how unwillingly carrying in his stomach, once pretending to know better the relevant directives.
for women to have abortions, is therefore required to engage in actions aimed at creating a greater intimacy with the unwanted fetus: ultrasound photos to tax law, the preparation of the unborn who do not want to give birth, the choice of name, to 'buy some toys etc.. in the hope that these unfortunate once guided will do a far more humane and sensible.
is an original solution that may be helpful in other cases of abuse and oppression. For example, if someone had planned to kill a human being born and trained, we could propose that the future murderess to create the intended victim, a room filled with beautiful things, maybe make friends with his family, inviting him to dinner, spend the holidays together, and why not do even best man at the wedding of his daughter.
The new bond had been created, thanks to all these good deeds would be an excellent deterrent against future criminal act. The same applies to anyone who wanted to commit an abuse of a person, the environment and even to himself.
This logic does not make a pence, certainly requires a large amount of time and money, but it could be an effective deterrent to anyone who has bad intentions towards others. It would be a sort of revival of the ancient law is not codified according to which we should not do to others what you do not want to see it done to us.
Unfortunately, no account is taken of this reciprocity ethical when the rights of women continue to be denied by the day. There are not many human beings who identify with the sacred right of liberty, fraternity egalite that the mother of the revolution had also laid down in respect of women two hundred years ago. Rather
altering the balance of nature, necessary to the overwhelming power of caste elected, has not ceased its journey on this track is distorted. Were not enough the two World Wars, the Constitution of the fundamental human rights and even feminism, to wash the evil of unjust inequality and abuses associated with it.
as now denied women the right to their own sacred self, and despite the deceptive appearance of greater autonomy and dignity, they continue to feed his own blood and soul sterile and inhuman absolutism.
must be very careful that these are innocent, because even if disguised as information and demanded respect for life, in substance inevitably result in the usual patronizing contempt against anyone who lives, as well as carried in her womb, should continue to protect against a system that is very often antivitale and decisively against the most vulnerable, including children.
found The American aim is to teach women the difference between good and evil, knowing that the imbalances and the confusion between what is right and wrong come from its elites fortunate.
Women should keep in mind that ancient physicians had a high regard for health and will of the woman about her real willingness to bring their pregnancies to term.
this priority was given until 1600, when the Catholic Church became intolerant of abortion, according to a leveling of the value of a woman's life and that of the fetus itself. Until then, every culture had recognized in abortion a natural function of the body and in many cases a necessity.
If the conscience of right-thinking people want to sleep soundly, and therefore feels obliged to issue more restrictive rules, although sophisticated and manipulative, detailed studies by the Guttmacher Institute and World Health Organization have clearly demonstrated that the incidence abortion is much higher in countries where the norms are more restrictive.
Recently Pope Benedict XVI has spoken out strongly in arguing against abortion which is against the laws of nature, but there were Popes that have shown very different opinions, as Pope Innocent III and Pope Gregory XIV which claimed the life of the fetus does not begin until 5 months after conception, and before he became Pope John XXI Pope wrote a book, The Treasure of the poor, which included recipes emmenagogue and contraceptives , and even the strict St. Augustine said that abortion is a crime only when the fetus is fully formed, which even then was estimated between the 40th and 80th day.
What then determines, by the institutions, a behavior more or less restrictive towards something that over the millennia has always belonged to the sphere of conscience and the decision of women? It requires more
than ever the question of how abortion is indeed an ethical issue rather than policy and whether the policy has ever been able to resolve an ethical issue or just any minimum, if it was still interested in safeguarding its strategies for maintain and possibly increase its power.
and text by A. Iurilli Duhamel
0 comments:
Post a Comment